Friday, November 18, 2011

Blog Post


I believe it is important for our group to consider the level of decorum we should use. I can see this project being one where plain or low style is put into practice. I’m not quite sure how visuals will be used in our paper for this project. Our group has plenty of experience incorporating pictures into papers, so we would not have any problems with that. I’m not quite sure what role an abstract would play in our multi-modal project. I don’t feel like it would be appropriate. Designing our visual argument is essential to convince people of our message. It would be fun to create our own visual that is a compilation of images, but I think we may end up doing a video compilation. Either way, our creativity needs to be apparent in the visual we provide. Pathos and Logos will be especially important to our topic if we choose to make an argument on how children’s TV shows today are teaching them the wrong things. Disney channel and other networks will provide the logos, while the actual shows and what’s going on in them will provide the logos. A parody would be interesting to use for our project, especially since we would be advocating the negative affects of children’s television shows. We could somehow transform a Disney channel ad to include negative aspects of a particular television show. Creating a website will take a lot of effort, but that may be the mode we choose to use to share our video or visual representation. I would not want the navigational scheme to be anything too simple. I would like it to be something fun and atypical for the viewer. I definitely want my group to use a splash page for the website. I think that would really capture our audience’s attention if we had a relevant quote or picture that popped up right before people entered the site. However, we do need to keep in mind the usability when we are creating our site. I know I hate when there are too many things going on when I enter a website that its too difficult to gather information. I think a video montage would be perfect for our group, since we are planning on doing our project on children’s cartoons and television shows. As long as we keep our audience in mind, we should not have any problems presenting our argument.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Blog post for pages 500-524


Certainly, ones position in the world shapes his or her views on culture, society, and identity. A victim's view is different from a photographer's, and a rescue team member's view is different from an onlooker's perception. A person's position defines the type of emotions he or she will have towards an event or a photograph. Jill Abramson, a managing editor, chose the photograph in figure 14.12 of the dead children because it accurately displayed the aftermath of the tsunami in the Indian Ocean. She has been trained to report the news as accurately as possible and choose photographs that best represent certain situations. This line of work can sometimes cause people to lose sensitivity. She was not considering how the reader might feel when he or she comes across the photo. Yes, it is accurate and people should see the picture, but it is shaping how the readers view that society and culture. The picture does not represent the entire population, yet that is what viewers will take from the photograph.
Charles Porter, a bank clerk and amateur photographer, captures another moment in history. Through his picture, Porter conveys the identity of the valiant firefighter and the helpless infant after the Oklahoma bombings. For many Americans, the photograph evoked concern and sadness, which is a result of what society and culture has caused them to feel. For someone living in the middle east, this type of tragedy happens more often, so they can better cope with the images than Americans who do not experience this very often. Society teaches the norms and values that people adopt and practice. Images, whether accurate or inaccurate, end up defining a culture. It is our responsibility to see the truth in them, and react accordingly. 

Friday, October 21, 2011


Elliott Thomas
Mr. Stowe
English 103, Section 20
21 October 2011
Nature vs. Nurture Outline
1.     Introduction
·      Hook- Nature versus nurture has been a lasting debate for several decades. So when will
·      Thesis- Criminal behavior is determined by a combination of nature and nurture because one relies on the other for development.
·      All of the research I have gathered supports both nature and nurture affecting human behavior, and that will be discussed in the introduction.
2.     Genes Role in Criminal Behavior
·      What genes affect behavior?
·      Serotonin and Dopamine are responsible for the activation of some genes and how those genes are expressed.
·      Certain neurochemicals are known to have a part in the initiation of violent behavior.
·      This image can be used a transition and create humor in the research paper.
·      Paul Arnold believes that, even though genes play a large role in behavior, one is still responsible for his or her crimes.
3.     Studies on twins in relation to behavior
·      First the studies discussed in the article “Sociological and Environmental Factors of Criminal Behavior” will be introduced. It states that twins raised by an adoptive family are as aggressive as that family, and not their biological parents.
·      Then Dr. Farber’s findings will be discussed. She believes that twins who are raised together have more differences than those raised apart because they are trying to create their own identity. This finding also supports the role of environment in behavioral development.
·      The picture above will be used to show the relationship between fraternal twins and identical twins.
·      Joe Richman’s article also supports the environmental affects on behavior of twins.
4.     Case about the Italian
·      Five brain scans were performed in order to come to the conclusion that 5 of the murderer’s genes were associated with violent behavior.
·      Some doctors are questioning the legitimacy of the reports because it all boils down to gene expression.
5.     Environment’s role in criminal behavior
·      Psychologists believe that deviants commit crimes because of “unsuccessful socialization”.
·      Dinitz and Reckless’ study will be discussed in order to prove that environment is a key component in developing certain behaviors and personalities.
6.     Nature and Nurture
·      The four remaining sources that I gathered that contain both nature and nurture will be used to support my argument.
·     
·      This image will be used to show that 

Wednesday, October 19, 2011


Elliott Thomas
Mr. Stowe
English 103, Section 20
19 October 2011
Nature versus Nurture Bibliography
This article considers a criminal’s responsibility for his or her crimes, since genes play such a large role in behavior. Paul Arnold brings up a case in Italy where a man’s murder sentence was shortened because of his predisposition to aggressive behavior. Arnold does not believe that everyone will take on criminal behavior if he or she has the gene for it. Bad genes do not excuse people from being responsible for their actions.

Arnold, Paul. “Nature vs Nurture of a Criminal Mind.” Bright Hub. N.p., 20 Nov 2009.Web. 18 Oct 2011. <http://www.brighthub.com/science/genetics/articles/55218.asp&xgt;>.

Italian courts reduced a murderer’s sentence by a year after testimonies proved he had bad behavioral genes. The court looked over 3 psychiatric reports that claim Bayout was not mentally stable when he committed the murder. Brain scans turned up abnormalities and 5 violent behavior genes. People are questioning the legitimacy of the psychiatric reports because so much factors into gene expression. Ethnicity and gene function are among those factors.

Feresin, Emiliano. “Lighter sentence for murderer with ‘bad genes’.” Nature news. N.p., 30 Oct 2009. Web. 18 Oct 2011. <http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091030/full/news.2009.1050.html>.

This article describes two experiments that were done with twins. Identical twins are more likely to both exhibit criminal behavior than the fraternal twins. Another study was done where twins were adopted by two different families and raised apart from each other. It concluded that a child is as aggressive as his or her guardians, not his or her biological parents. Obviously, nurture plays a role in violent behavior. 

French, Joanna, Lindette Thornton, Matt Kuhls, and Adam Himebauch. “Sociological and Environmental Factos of Criminal Behavior.” Genetic Predisposition to Criminality- Should It Be Monitored?. N.p., 21 Nov 2000. Web. 18 Oct 2011. <http://www.udel.edu/chem./C465/senior/fall00/GeneticTesting/enviro.htm>.

Dr. Farber is well versed in identical twins studies pertaining to their upbringing. She identifies a pattern seen in many twins’ studies, which is that twins who are raised together have more personality differences than those raised apart. This supports the argument that nurture does in fact play a role in personality development. Even though this study has nothing to do with criminal behavior, it highlights the importance of nurture.

Gruber, Howard. “Nature VS. Nurture: A Natural Experiment.” The New York Times. N.p., 01 Mar 1981. Web. 18 Oct 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/01/books/nature-vs-nurture-a-natural-experiemtn.html?pagewanted=all>.

This is an extensive article that will provide me with a multitude of research. It discusses the neurochemicals that play a role in violent behavior and what the level of each chemical indicates. Certain personality traits and disorders are known explanations for criminal behavior, as well. Serotonin and dopamine are responsible for certain behaviors and how they are activated.

Jones, Caitlin. “Genetic and Environmental Influences on Criminal Behavior.” Personality Papers. N.p, Feb 2005. Web. 25 Sep 2011. <http://personalityresearch.org/papers/jones.htm>.

Psychologists believe that deviants came to be that way because of “’unsuccessful’ socialization”. They believe personality develops through social experiences, even though some traits are inherited. A study done by Walter Reckless and Simon Dinitz shows the behavioral tendencies of schoolboys who are categorized as good or bad. The conclusion of the study indicated that certain personalities could control deviant behavior.

Macionis, John. Society the Basics. 11th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2011. 173-174. Print.

A 1993 study expressed Americans' beliefs on how people turn out later in life. The article also discusses the role of sexuality. People cannot overcome the drive because it blocks out rational thought. This could explain why violent rapes take place. Also, Culture has been proven to shape our innateness.

“Nature vs. Nurture: How much free will do really we have?.” Social Psychology. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Sep 2011. <http://www.trinity.edu/mkearl/socpsy-2.htm>.

This article explains the complexity of nature versus nature. Basically, violent behavior manifests from both nature and nurture. Certain alleles and genotypes combined with early childhood environment can explain why people are more violent later in life. Only the abstract is used for this source because the rest of the source is complex and very thorough.

Reif, Andreas, Michael Rosler, Christine Freitag, marc Schneider, Andrea Eujen, Christian Kissling, Denise Wenzler, and Christian Jacob. “Nature and Nurture Predispose to Violent Behavior: Serotonergic Genes and Adverse Childhood Environment.’ Neuropsychopharmacology. Nature publishing group., 07 Mar 2001. Web. 24 Sep 2011. <http://nature.com/npp/journal/v32/n11/full/1301359a.html>.

Even though this article solely talks about serial killers, it provides insight into the argument of nature versus nurture in relation to criminal behavior. Most serial killers were raised in an abusive or neglectful environment, which would contribute to their violent tendencies. Problems with the frontal lobe of the brain, which controls normal human behavior, have been found in many serial killers. Most serial killers commit deviant acts due to a change in environment, which goes to show that environment is an important factor in criminal behavior.

“Serial Killers: Nature vs. nurture.” Serendip. N.p., 18 Dec 2007. Web. 25 Sep 2011. <http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1598>.

Joe Richman describes a study of twins separated at birth and raised by two different families. They later find out that they are twins and seek out each other. The twins believe that they have the same basic personality, and one of them argues genetics have larger role in personality development than the nurture side of development. Certainly, this study is perfect because it started from their birth, which is unlike any other of its kind.

Richman, Joe. “’Identical Strangers’ Explore Nature Vs. Nurture.” npr books. N.p., 25 Oct 2007. Web. 18 Oct. 2011. <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15629096>.

This source discusses the problems with viewing behavior as either nature or nurture. Inherited genes do affect behavior, but one cannot discount the environment in which the person grows. People learn different behaviors in order to replace the ones that are already inherent. In conclusion, all behavior is the result of gene expression and environmental influences.

“The role of nature and nurture in the development of behaviour.” University of Plymouth Department of Psychology. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Oct 2011. <http://www. flyfishingdevon.co.uk/salmon/year1/psy128animal_bahviour/animbeha.htm>.


Cochran, Gove, and Wood explore the motivations behind violent crimes by sampling 295 inmates from two correctional facilities in Oklahoma and asking them specific questions. Most people are driven to commit deviant acts because of the pleasure or “high” they get from the crime. The psychological process that takes place when someone is committing a crime can be compared to the same process that occurs when someone becomes addicted to drugs. One can see that nature and nurture play a part in criminal behavior.


Wood, Peter, Walter Gove, and John Cochran. “Motivations For Violent Crime Among Incarcerated Adults: A consideration of Reinforcement Processes.” N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Oct 2011. <http://www.doc.state.ok.us/offenders/ocjrc/94060G.HTM>.


Wednesday, September 28, 2011


Elliott Thomas
Mr. Stowe
English 103, Section 20
28 September 2011
Research Paper Freewrite
            Nature versus nurture in relation to human behavior has been a constant debate for many decades. After many experiments, scientist cannot seem to eliminate one or the other. Both have proven to affect human behavior. Criminal behavior is caused by genetic mishaps and certain disorders developed at birth. Environmental influences play a significant role in the development of aggressive behavior. How a person is raised determines how a gene is expressed. Criminals often cannot be blamed for their actions because their upbringing and gene expression has caused them to lose control of their behavior. Therefore, criminal behavior is determined by a combination of nature and nurture because one relies on the other for development.
            The sources I have already found are credible. The first source I found is from a neuropsychopharmacology website. It is well maintained by nature publishing group and the article is over 4 years old. It explains the complexity of nature versus nurture in respect to genes and their role. Another online source discusses experiments performed that conclude environment is essential to the development of violent behavior. The other sources support the conclusion that ones surroundings and culture shape our personalities and our gene expression. I suspect I will need some more sources that discuss the specific genes that are involved with violent behavior. Also, I would like to research specific crimes, which support environmental influences on violent behavior. Conducting an interview would be beneficial, but I think my research topic may be too complex to find someone who is fluent in this subject.
I may run into problems concerning the broadness of my topic. I have limited it to criminal behavior, not just behavior in general. If I run into problems with my topic being too broad, I may limit it, specifically, to serial killers and how nature and nurture affect their behavior. I could run into sources on nature being too complex for me to comprehend; however, this could be avoided by limiting the amount of primary sources I choose to use. I will have to thoroughly reword and generalize the information I obtain about gene functions, so that the reader can understand the facts without getting confused. 

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Supporting research paper articles

Nature and Nurture Predispose to Violent Behavior: Serotonergic Genes and Adverse Childhood Environment

http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/v32/n11/abs/1301359a.html

This article explains the complexity of nature versus nature. Basically, violent behavior manifests from both nature and nurture. Certain alleles and genotypes combined with early childhood environment can explain why people are more violent later in life. 

Sociological and Environmental Factors 
of Criminal Behavior

http://www.udel.edu/chem/C465/senior/fall00/GeneticTesting/enviro.htm

This article describes two experiments that were done with twins. Identical twins are more likely to both exhibit criminal behavior than the fraternal twins. Another study was done where twins were adopted by two different families apart from each other. It concluded that a child is as aggressive as his or her guardians, not his or her biological parents. Obviously, nurture plays a role in violent behavior. 

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Criminal Behavior

http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/jones.html

This is an extensive article that will provide me with a multitude of research material for my paper. It discusses the neurochemicals that play a role in violent behavior and what the levels of each chemical indicates. Certain personality traits and disorders are known explanations for criminal behavior, as well. 

Serial Killers: Nature vs. Nurture


http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1598

Even though this article solely talks about serial killers, its provides insight into the argument of nature versus nurture in relation to criminal behavior. Most serial killers were raised in an abusive or neglectful environment, which would contribute to their violent tendencies. Problems with the frontal lobe of the brain, which controls normal human behavior, has been found in many serial killers. 

NATURE VS. NURTURE:
HOW MUCH FREE WILL DO REALLY WE HAVE?

http://www.trinity.edu/mkearl/socpsy-2.html

A 1993 study expressed Americans' beliefs on how we turn out later in life. The article also discuss the role of sexuality. We cannot overcome the drive because the it blocks out rational thought. This could explain why violent rapes take place. Culture has been proven to shape our innateness. 



Sunday, September 18, 2011

Research Paper Topics

Kinesiology

Kinesiology is the scientific study of human movement. This topic is really interesting to me because I find human behavior fascinating. I would like to argue that lie detector tests are accurate in their conclusions. I would go into detail about kinesiology and its background. Then i would argue that it has a vital part in lie detection.

Understanding Dreams


According to scientist, the average person spends about 6 years dreaming, but they have yet to figure out why we have dreams. I would like to argue that we can in fact control some of our dreams. However, dream control is not instantaneous and does not always work the way you want it to. I would go into detail about lucid and non-lucid dreaming and how to control those dreams. I think there is a lot to talk discuss in regard to this research topic. I have always found dreams fascinating and would like to do more research.

Friday, September 9, 2011

Picture for paper and thesis



Kacey Kahl's tattoo employs ethos, pathos, logos, and especially kairos because the underlying message of this particular piece of body art is he will guard and protect any woman's heart. 

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Fat is NOT an advertising issue


When I think of real beauty, I picture the models and famous people in today’s pop culture. This may sound shallow, but it is what society has led me to believe is the essence of beauty. I know how hard it is for some women to accept their body for what it is, and that is why no advertising scheme could possibly change someone’s mind about accepting her body.
         Sure, a television ad for Dove, featuring women of all shapes, could make one feel good about herself for the time being, but it will not have a lasting effect. I for one did not buy the Dove products because of its campaign for real beauty. It honestly had no effect on me accepting my body. It is the model or the gorgeous actress that keeps us striving to better ourselves, because we cannot accept our bodies. No beauty campaign can change that. Even without the models or the actresses, women try to change their look in order to be like someone they are familiar with, perhaps a neighbor or co-worker. I almost think striving for physical perfection is instinctive. I do not believe women obsess over their image as Orbach so bluntly puts it by saying “It’s the only way to be. She will involve herself in trying to look younger, skinnier, taller, bigger-breasted, smaller-breasted and making sure ever surface is coiffed…” (388). Few women consume themselves with the thoughts of changing their bodies. There is not always that feeling of having to transform yourself.         
Magazines such as Seventeen and Self provide positive ways of changing your look or improving your lifestyle. After I flip through those magazines, I feel a sense of motivation to enhance my looks, not feeling depressed by the fact that I may never look like Rachel McAdams. The fact is that no matter what someone does to change her body, she will never accept herself for what she is. She will always find some part of her to alter at some point in her life, and there is nothing wrong with that, and there is nothing we can do to change that. 

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Blog 3


This old cocoa cola light ad emphasizes how light its drink really is by having someone pour the coke into a cup, but instead of it going into the cup, it sort of pours upwards. It did this because we usually think of clouds or balloons as being light and being present in the sky, which is what the soda is doing. The coca cola emblem is imprinted on the ad twice, which establishes the ethos. People are immediately going to trust this ad because of the company’s credibility. Because coke has been around for many years and people have probably bought it at one time or another, they already have an intimate connection with the company. 


Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Blog post for 8/31


mad-men-logo-1.jpg

So of course as I'm looking up ads to analyze for this blog post, I came across the show Mad Men's ads. After all, the show is known for being about ad executives from Madison Avenue. As I looked at the ad for this renowned TV show, I could easily point out the ethos, logos, and pathos present in the picture.
Just looking at the colors in the ad gives you the sense that the show has a dark side to it because of the grey, black, and red. The two lines at the top of the ad help to establish the ethos, or credibility, of the show. Notice how The Sopranos is written in red just like the word mad in Mad Men. One could infer that Mad Men may have some gory scenes like the ones found in The Sopranos. One could also infer that if you like The Sopranos then you will like Man Men because the same person wrote and produced the two shows. The creator of this ad is obviously trying to make a connection between the two shows.
The logos present in this article is stated right under the show’s title. “Where the truth lies” is a strong statement for this ad. It is written relatively small compared to the title’s size, but I believe that was done on purpose to emphasize how difficult it is to find the truth in ordinary people’s lives. I think the masculinity of this ad and the statement it gives attracts and convinces the audience to watch Mad Men. There isn’t much to it because it is straight forward.
Establishing an intimate connection is not the intention of this ad. Notice that the man in the ad is not facing forward, however he seems very relaxed. The cigarette in his hand and the word men are colored white. This coincidence suggests that the time period may be the 1960’s. Racism was rampant throughout this decade. White men were supreme, which is probably why the creator of this ad chose the color white for men. Perhaps the creator wanted to create a connection, or establish pathos, with people who lived during the 1960’s. The man in the suit on the ad could be appealing to potential viewers who are businessmen.
This is where kairos comes into play. In our modern world, it is easy to forget about the past and to keep seeking the future. This ad is refreshing because it does take you back to the simplicity of the 60’s but is relatable in the sense that there were “mad men” decades ago and there are “mad men” today.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Thursday, August 25, 2011

First Blog Assignment

Television commercials for shoes, clothes, furniture, churches, and shows are some of the basic images that are seen everyday by millions of viewers. These images have the ability to attract our attention, but it all boils down to how persuasive their ads are. For instance, if a commercial came out for a new television show and the commercial only showed boring clips from the first few episodes, then the likelihood of one watching the first episode is slim. There has to be a level of excitement, which in turn attracts viewers. That is why networks put together an intriguing commercial with some of the best, most exciting scenes in order to persuade viewers to watch their show, perhaps, instead of another network’s show. For daily images such as commercials for shoes, clothes, or furniture, suppliers usually attract buyers by putting their product on a beautiful model or adding an incentive, such as receiving a free mattress with the purchase of a bedroom set, if one buys their product. These tricks are very persuasive to the public, however there are simpler ways of attracting customers, such as using humor. Having a quirky, funny person who sings a jingle or cracks a joke is always a good way to appeal to potential buyers. In the end persuasion all boils down to presentation.